Quick Memo

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Quick Memo

Apr. 21st, 2011 at 4:34 PM

caitri

In Salon-J for Supernatural & Gender panel. Why oh why did they not book J-2 instead?

I'm feelin': amused

Comments

( 8 comments — Add your .02 )

tn_tiger

Apr. 21st, 2011 09:35 pm (UTC)

Supernatural and Gender?

I want to hear all about this. I am intrigued.

Link | Reply | Thread

caitri

Apr. 21st, 2011 10:27 pm (UTC)

Re: Supernatural and Gender?

There actually hasn't been so much gender talk thus far. There was a paper on gen fic h/c, a paper on the show and retro nostalgia as post-9/11 reactionism-reactionism (I actually enjoyed the hell out of this one) There's a rambling talk on the love triangle of the boys and Ruby: meh.

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread

tn_tiger

Apr. 22nd, 2011 03:51 pm (UTC)

Re: Supernatural and Gender?

Hmm. I'm only through S2. I looked up Ruby last night...haven't met her yet. As for love triangle...I have a REAL simple solution which is ideal for fanfic, and should please everybody but the Wincest crowd. :p

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread

claudia_nic

Apr. 21st, 2011 09:47 pm (UTC)

I know these people who can go on for hours about how SPN is very woman unfriendly. They all die....
Are those people with you overthere?

Link | Reply | Thread

caitri

Apr. 21st, 2011 10:28 pm (UTC)

Not speaking anyhow...*waits for general discussion*

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread

tn_tiger

Apr. 22nd, 2011 03:50 pm (UTC)

I think it has mad gender problems, which I don't know how to fully articulate yet. But I love it anyway. There's certainly a lot to be said about performative masculinity in Supernatural.

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread