?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Goddangit

Todd just dared me to write the first This Means War/Red crossover. And then to have the Chris and Karl characters not hook up. (He wants Chris to hook up with John Malkovich.)

GO AWAY PLOTBUNNIES THIS IS NOT THE TIME.

Comments

( 19 comments — Add your .02 )
aadarshinah
Oct. 19th, 2011 08:08 pm (UTC)
(He wants Chris to hook up with John Malkovich.)

Blasphemy!
(Deleted comment)
avictoriangirl
Oct. 19th, 2011 09:36 pm (UTC)
(He wants Chris to hook up with John Malkovich.)

DDDDDD8
amine_eyes
Oct. 19th, 2011 09:45 pm (UTC)
DO IT DO IT DO IT!!!!

(after the tenture vote :D)
tocourtdisaster
Oct. 19th, 2011 10:56 pm (UTC)
Oh my god. That would be hysterical, for several different reasons. Though I'm still bitter that Chris and Tom's characters don't hook up at any point in the movie because that? That is something I would pay $10 to see. ;)
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:16 pm (UTC)
I'd pay $10 not to have to watch the movie without it. >_>
tocourtdisaster
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:24 pm (UTC)
I feel like I should be able to understand what you're trying to say, but for some reason, I can't quite parse your grammar here. So you WANT to see a Tom/Chris hookup or your DON'T want to see a Tom/Chris hookup?

*so confused*
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:34 pm (UTC)
...No.

Are you drunk? Again? At WORK, Leah?

No. Wait? Am I drunk? I don't know. It was like 10 minutes ago and I am literally operating on 3 hours of sleep. I've forgotten what I meant. It was probably awesome though.

why do you have all the good icons?
tocourtdisaster
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:49 pm (UTC)
I'm not at work anymore, so if I were drunk (which I'm NOT, thank you very much), it wouldn't be very scandalous. ;)

And I have all the good icons because I'm amazing. CLEARLY.
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 11:15 pm (UTC)
Of course.

Anyway, I was on my phone earlier and messages weren't loading properly so I couldn't see my earlier comment. Now that I'm at a computer I can tell you I meant exactly what I said. In other words, the movie looks awful and without the lure of Chris-on-Tom action you couldn't make me sit through it much less pry the price of admission from my cold, dead fingers.

Clear enough? :D
tocourtdisaster
Oct. 20th, 2011 11:19 pm (UTC)
That's what I thought you meant, but one can never be too sure. ;)
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 11:27 pm (UTC)
If you thought I meant anything else you clearly don't know me at all.
tocourtdisaster
Oct. 20th, 2011 11:31 pm (UTC)
It's the arctic cold, Evi; it's destroyed my ability to reason and caused me to confuse you and Cait.
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 11:35 pm (UTC)
LMAO. You're forgiven.

This time.
blue_jack
Oct. 20th, 2011 01:43 am (UTC)
D8

D8 D8 D8 D8 D8

DON'T DO IT, CAIT!!!!!!
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:13 pm (UTC)
Quiet you. If not this, who KNOWS what she'll write. It will probable have ponies.
Todd Samuelson
Oct. 20th, 2011 01:59 am (UTC)
Actually, my preference would be to see Chris with Helen Mirren. Whatever will surprise us. (Bonus points for finishing before the next preview is released.)
caitri
Oct. 20th, 2011 04:04 am (UTC)
<---------

Okay, so the Chris character with Helen Mirren. But what about Ivan???
gadgetorious
Oct. 20th, 2011 10:10 pm (UTC)
Dead. I am dead. This is a postmortem giggle attack.
( 19 comments — Add your .02 )

Latest Month

July 2017
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow